<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 36 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23455</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition, upholding the ITAT&#039;s factual finding that the alleged gifts were genuine and that the CIT&#039;s order under s. 263 could be set aside. The court held this was a pure question of fact based on the record; absent tangible evidence beyond suspicion, receipts from abroad could not be treated as the assessee&#039;s income. No question of law arose, so the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the s. 263 order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 21:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 36 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23455</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition, upholding the ITAT&#039;s factual finding that the alleged gifts were genuine and that the CIT&#039;s order under s. 263 could be set aside. The court held this was a pure question of fact based on the record; absent tangible evidence beyond suspicion, receipts from abroad could not be treated as the assessee&#039;s income. No question of law arose, so the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the s. 263 order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>