<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 321 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399347</link>
    <description>Subscription to non-convertible debentures carrying fixed returns and a repayment schedule was treated as financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The record showed interest payments up to 31.10.2016, followed by non-payment, repeated requests for extension of time, and letters acknowledging that repayment had not begun; the corporate debtor also filed no reply or factual dispute. On that basis, default was established and the section 7 application was fit for admission, because the adjudicating authority&#039;s enquiry is limited to whether default has occurred and does not extend to a broader merits review. Financial statements likewise indicated inability to repay debts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 321 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399347</link>
      <description>Subscription to non-convertible debentures carrying fixed returns and a repayment schedule was treated as financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The record showed interest payments up to 31.10.2016, followed by non-payment, repeated requests for extension of time, and letters acknowledging that repayment had not begun; the corporate debtor also filed no reply or factual dispute. On that basis, default was established and the section 7 application was fit for admission, because the adjudicating authority&#039;s enquiry is limited to whether default has occurred and does not extend to a broader merits review. Financial statements likewise indicated inability to repay debts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>