<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Bounce Case: Accused Convicted u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for Insufficient Funds and Failed Defense.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55067</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - section 138 of NI Act - Failure to prove the payment of money to third person on behalf of complainant - both the trial court as well as the session judge&#039;s court have rightly rejected the defence taken up by the accused and have rightly convicted the accused for the alleged guilt. - Tri</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:54:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Bounce Case: Accused Convicted u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for Insufficient Funds and Failed Defense.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55067</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - section 138 of NI Act - Failure to prove the payment of money to third person on behalf of complainant - both the trial court as well as the session judge&#039;s court have rightly rejected the defence taken up by the accused and have rightly convicted the accused for the alleged guilt. - Tri</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:54:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>