<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1555 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290660</link>
    <description>A one-day delay in filing the main company petition for approval of a scheme of amalgamation was condoned because the applicant explained that the authorised signatory was unavailable due to a medical emergency and an alternate director had to be contacted for signature. The tribunal treated the delay as minimal and found the explanation sufficient, so the condonation application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1555 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290660</link>
      <description>A one-day delay in filing the main company petition for approval of a scheme of amalgamation was condoned because the applicant explained that the authorised signatory was unavailable due to a medical emergency and an alternate director had to be contacted for signature. The tribunal treated the delay as minimal and found the explanation sufficient, so the condonation application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>