<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1812 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290657</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining the reopening under Section 148 invalid due to insufficient evidence and inappropriate jurisdiction. It emphasized the need for corroborative evidence and adherence to natural justice principles. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 560,000 under Section 69, restoring the returned income and quashing the AO and CIT(A) orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1812 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290657</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining the reopening under Section 148 invalid due to insufficient evidence and inappropriate jurisdiction. It emphasized the need for corroborative evidence and adherence to natural justice principles. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 560,000 under Section 69, restoring the returned income and quashing the AO and CIT(A) orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>