https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290666 The court set aside the disqualification of directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, and directed the reactivation of their Director Identification Numbers (DINs). It held that the provision should have prospective effect from 1.4.2014 and that violations occurring after this date could be addressed. The court clarified that Section 252 does not provide an alternative remedy for director disqualifications or DIN deactivations. The writ petitions were allowed, and interlocutory applications were closed without costs. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:52:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290666 The court set aside the disqualification of directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, and directed the reactivation of their Director Identification Numbers (DINs). It held that the provision should have prospective effect from 1.4.2014 and that violations occurring after this date could be addressed. The court clarified that Section 252 does not provide an alternative remedy for director disqualifications or DIN deactivations. The writ petitions were allowed, and interlocutory applications were closed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290666