<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 760 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290645</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the &quot;Mobilisation Advance&quot; Bank Guarantee, deeming the invocation improper and restoring the injunction order. The appeal concerning the &quot;Performance Guarantee&quot; Bank Guarantee was dismissed, maintaining the injunction order granted by the Single Judge. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 12:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 760 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290645</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the &quot;Mobilisation Advance&quot; Bank Guarantee, deeming the invocation improper and restoring the injunction order. The appeal concerning the &quot;Performance Guarantee&quot; Bank Guarantee was dismissed, maintaining the injunction order granted by the Single Judge. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>