https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23448 Tax notices under the Income-tax Act were stated to be challengeable through the statutory remedy, so writ relief was not to be invoked where an adequate alternative remedy existed. The request for return of account books was declined because retention was authorised and the retention period had been extended. The allegation that the first appellate hearing was conducted behind the petitioner's back was treated as a disputed question of fact and left to be urged before the ITAT, where the second appeal was pending. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:20:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23448 Tax notices under the Income-tax Act were stated to be challengeable through the statutory remedy, so writ relief was not to be invoked where an adequate alternative remedy existed. The request for return of account books was declined because retention was authorised and the retention period had been extended. The allegation that the first appellate hearing was conducted behind the petitioner's back was treated as a disputed question of fact and left to be urged before the ITAT, where the second appeal was pending. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23448