<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 297 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399323</link>
    <description>A substituted DTAA tax rate notified under section 90 was treated as replacing the earlier rate provision in full, so the new lower rate applied for the entire previous year and not only from the notification date. The analysis applied the principle that a substituted provision operates as a repeal of the former provision and comes into force in its place. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to the revised 10% rate for assessment year 2006-07, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 297 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399323</link>
      <description>A substituted DTAA tax rate notified under section 90 was treated as replacing the earlier rate provision in full, so the new lower rate applied for the entire previous year and not only from the notification date. The analysis applied the principle that a substituted provision operates as a repeal of the former provision and comes into force in its place. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to the revised 10% rate for assessment year 2006-07, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>