<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 24 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23446</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the expenditure incurred for issuing bonus shares is capital expenditure and not deductible. Surtax payable under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, is not deductible as business expenditure. The reimbursement of salaries and other expenses, along with the weighted deduction under section 35C, were ruled in favor of the Revenue. The certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court was granted for the second question but not for the first question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 24 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23446</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the expenditure incurred for issuing bonus shares is capital expenditure and not deductible. Surtax payable under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, is not deductible as business expenditure. The reimbursement of salaries and other expenses, along with the weighted deduction under section 35C, were ruled in favor of the Revenue. The certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court was granted for the second question but not for the first question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>