<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Invalid Due to Lack of Evidence on Alleged Bogus Purchases by Revenue Authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55065</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases - No clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could have thus validly been imposed upon him - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:46:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:46:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Invalid Due to Lack of Evidence on Alleged Bogus Purchases by Revenue Authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55065</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases - No clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could have thus validly been imposed upon him - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:46:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>