https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399316 The Tribunal ordered the restoration of the Appellant Company's name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company, engaged in real estate business since 1994, faced strike off due to non-compliance with filing requirements. Despite the Registrar of Companies' defense citing negligence, the Tribunal found merit in the appeal. The company must file pending documents, pay costs, and adhere to directives, including restrictions on asset disposal. Compliance and accountability were emphasized in the restoration process. en-us Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2020 20:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399316 The Tribunal ordered the restoration of the Appellant Company's name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company, engaged in real estate business since 1994, faced strike off due to non-compliance with filing requirements. Despite the Registrar of Companies' defense citing negligence, the Tribunal found merit in the appeal. The company must file pending documents, pay costs, and adhere to directives, including restrictions on asset disposal. Compliance and accountability were emphasized in the restoration process. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399316