https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399315 The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under CTH 17019990, rejecting the appellant's arguments for alternative classifications. The demand for differential duty for the normal period was confirmed, while the demand for the extended period was set aside due to limitation. The imposition of the penalty under Section 112(a) was deemed unwarranted and set aside. en-us Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:45:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399315 The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under CTH 17019990, rejecting the appellant's arguments for alternative classifications. The demand for differential duty for the normal period was confirmed, while the demand for the extended period was set aside due to limitation. The imposition of the penalty under Section 112(a) was deemed unwarranted and set aside. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399315