<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 281 - CESTAT MUMABI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning prior orders, by recognizing the importance of outdoor catering services in maintaining optimal working conditions and reducing manhours, thus impacting the manufacturing process. It relied on the Rajasthan HC judgment, which deemed such services necessary, despite the Revenue&#039;s contention of ineligibility post-2011 amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 281 - CESTAT MUMABI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning prior orders, by recognizing the importance of outdoor catering services in maintaining optimal working conditions and reducing manhours, thus impacting the manufacturing process. It relied on the Rajasthan HC judgment, which deemed such services necessary, despite the Revenue&#039;s contention of ineligibility post-2011 amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>