https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23441 The Court declined to recast the proposed reference or direct a reference on alleged prejudice to the Revenue because the Revenue had not framed any question challenging the assessment order on that independent footing. The proposed questions were confined to the validity of the partnership and the character of the income, and those issues had already been declined in a connected matter. In the absence of a properly proposed question of law, no question of law arose for consideration, and the request to reword the question was rejected. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:07:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23441 The Court declined to recast the proposed reference or direct a reference on alleged prejudice to the Revenue because the Revenue had not framed any question challenging the assessment order on that independent footing. The proposed questions were confined to the validity of the partnership and the character of the income, and those issues had already been declined in a connected matter. In the absence of a properly proposed question of law, no question of law arose for consideration, and the request to reword the question was rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 02 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23441