https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290630 Non-appearance of an assessee on the adjourned hearing date, without any adjournment request, justified dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution under Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules. The Tribunal noted that the hearing date had been recorded in the order sheet and, in the absence of any appearance, inferred lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. Applying Rule 19(2) and the precedent relied upon, it held that dismissal for non-prosecution was warranted and dismissed the appeal. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2020 19:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290630 Non-appearance of an assessee on the adjourned hearing date, without any adjournment request, justified dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution under Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules. The Tribunal noted that the hearing date had been recorded in the order sheet and, in the absence of any appearance, inferred lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. Applying Rule 19(2) and the precedent relied upon, it held that dismissal for non-prosecution was warranted and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290630