https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399284 The court allowed the amendment of the petition but noted the petitioner's decision not to press the challenge to the vires of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the transfer application before the Supreme Court was deemed irrelevant and not pursued by the department. The court acknowledged the need for time to address the matter and scheduled the petition for final disposal on 12th October 2020, allowing for replies and rejoinders to be filed within specified timelines. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399284 The court allowed the amendment of the petition but noted the petitioner's decision not to press the challenge to the vires of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the transfer application before the Supreme Court was deemed irrelevant and not pursued by the department. The court acknowledged the need for time to address the matter and scheduled the petition for final disposal on 12th October 2020, allowing for replies and rejoinders to be filed within specified timelines. Case-Laws GST Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399284