<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 240 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the DRP&#039;s directions and the AO&#039;s final assessment order, dismissing the appeal. The key points include the emphasis on annual comparability assessment based on FAR analysis and the rejection of PAE Ltd. as a comparable due to significant product and market differences. The decision highlights the importance of realistic and functionally comparable transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:39:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 240 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the DRP&#039;s directions and the AO&#039;s final assessment order, dismissing the appeal. The key points include the emphasis on annual comparability assessment based on FAR analysis and the rejection of PAE Ltd. as a comparable due to significant product and market differences. The decision highlights the importance of realistic and functionally comparable transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>