<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399260</link>
    <description>The court found the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision on the re-export of goods inadequate and not in line with its directive. It directed the Commissioner to issue a new order within a specific timeframe, adhering to the court&#039;s previous directive and considering relevant legal provisions. The court emphasized the importance of complying with legal procedures and directives, ensuring a lawful resolution to the petitioner&#039;s request for re-export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399260</link>
      <description>The court found the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision on the re-export of goods inadequate and not in line with its directive. It directed the Commissioner to issue a new order within a specific timeframe, adhering to the court&#039;s previous directive and considering relevant legal provisions. The court emphasized the importance of complying with legal procedures and directives, ensuring a lawful resolution to the petitioner&#039;s request for re-export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>