<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399259</link>
    <description>An unstayed appellate order setting aside a customs assessment had to be given effect by subordinate authorities, and the filing of a departmental appeal did not suspend that obligation. The authorities could not refuse clearance of the imported watch on the ground that an appeal was pending. Provisional release under section 110-A of the Customs Act was also inapplicable because there was no seizure under section 110 and no pending adjudication; once the assessment order was set aside, it could not support bond and bank guarantee conditions inconsistent with the appellate order. The customs authorities were directed to release the goods in accordance with the appellate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399259</link>
      <description>An unstayed appellate order setting aside a customs assessment had to be given effect by subordinate authorities, and the filing of a departmental appeal did not suspend that obligation. The authorities could not refuse clearance of the imported watch on the ground that an appeal was pending. Provisional release under section 110-A of the Customs Act was also inapplicable because there was no seizure under section 110 and no pending adjudication; once the assessment order was set aside, it could not support bond and bank guarantee conditions inconsistent with the appellate order. The customs authorities were directed to release the goods in accordance with the appellate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>