<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 230 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Applicant&#039;s plea for condonation of delay in submitting the Expression of Interest (EoI) and participation in the sale process. However, the sale of IL &amp;amp; FS shares in CPG to Vision Plus Security Control Private Limited was approved and the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) implementation was ordered, as it complied with the Resolution Framework. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 230 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Applicant&#039;s plea for condonation of delay in submitting the Expression of Interest (EoI) and participation in the sale process. However, the sale of IL &amp;amp; FS shares in CPG to Vision Plus Security Control Private Limited was approved and the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) implementation was ordered, as it complied with the Resolution Framework. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>