<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 222 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399248</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the liquidator&#039;s rejection of the claim for idle charges improper and directed the liquidator to include the claimed amounts in the admitted claim of the appellant. The application was allowed, and the liquidator was instructed to admit the claim in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:13:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 222 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399248</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the liquidator&#039;s rejection of the claim for idle charges improper and directed the liquidator to include the claimed amounts in the admitted claim of the appellant. The application was allowed, and the liquidator was instructed to admit the claim in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>