<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court rules improper rejection of SVLDRS 1 declaration; singular includes plural u/s 13(2) of General Clauses Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55037</link>
    <description>Rejection of Petitioner&#039;s declaration in form SVLDRS 1 - Section 13 (2) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 can be invoked in terms of which the “words in the singular shall include the plural, and vice-versa” - in the present case the Petitioner&#039;s application ought not to have been rejected only on the ground that one declaration, and not four, was filed on 30th December, 2019. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:50:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court rules improper rejection of SVLDRS 1 declaration; singular includes plural u/s 13(2) of General Clauses Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55037</link>
      <description>Rejection of Petitioner&#039;s declaration in form SVLDRS 1 - Section 13 (2) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 can be invoked in terms of which the “words in the singular shall include the plural, and vice-versa” - in the present case the Petitioner&#039;s application ought not to have been rejected only on the ground that one declaration, and not four, was filed on 30th December, 2019. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:50:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>