<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 198 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original, allowing the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with Rule 6 (3A) of Cenvat Credit Rules and the proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit for exempted services. The penalties and demands imposed by the Department were overturned, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the Department&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 198 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original, allowing the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with Rule 6 (3A) of Cenvat Credit Rules and the proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit for exempted services. The penalties and demands imposed by the Department were overturned, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the Department&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>