<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1212 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that no violation of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act occurred in the instances highlighted by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific findings for disallowance under Section 40A(3) and overturned the arbitrary estimate made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), directing the deletion of the sustained addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 18:27:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1212 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that no violation of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act occurred in the instances highlighted by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific findings for disallowance under Section 40A(3) and overturned the arbitrary estimate made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), directing the deletion of the sustained addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>