<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (3) TMI 25 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290603</link>
    <description>A document that records the end of a common venture, settlement of balances, assignment of the outstanding sum, and the parties&#039; relinquishment of further interest may amount to a deed of dissolution only if the executants are individual proprietors. Partnership under Section 239 of the Contract Act exists only between persons capable of forming a statutory partnership, and a firm cannot be a partner in another firm for stamp purposes. Where the executants were firms, the transaction could not be treated as dissolution of partnership under Article 46-B of Schedule 1 of the Stamp Act; where the executants were sole owners, it could be so treated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 17:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (3) TMI 25 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290603</link>
      <description>A document that records the end of a common venture, settlement of balances, assignment of the outstanding sum, and the parties&#039; relinquishment of further interest may amount to a deed of dissolution only if the executants are individual proprietors. Partnership under Section 239 of the Contract Act exists only between persons capable of forming a statutory partnership, and a firm cannot be a partner in another firm for stamp purposes. Where the executants were firms, the transaction could not be treated as dissolution of partnership under Article 46-B of Schedule 1 of the Stamp Act; where the executants were sole owners, it could be so treated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>