<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (9) TMI 10 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290600</link>
    <description>A partnership firm has no separate legal personality apart from its partners, so it cannot itself be treated as a contracting person for partnership purposes; however, an agreement made by the partners jointly or through an authorised agent remains effective, and the use of the firm name does not by itself invalidate the transaction. Order 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure also permits partners to sue in the firm name as a procedural matter, provided the real parties in interest are the partners and the plaint is signed by an authorised person. On that basis, the suit was maintainable in principle and the matter was remanded for disposal according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (9) TMI 10 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290600</link>
      <description>A partnership firm has no separate legal personality apart from its partners, so it cannot itself be treated as a contracting person for partnership purposes; however, an agreement made by the partners jointly or through an authorised agent remains effective, and the use of the firm name does not by itself invalidate the transaction. Order 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure also permits partners to sue in the firm name as a procedural matter, provided the real parties in interest are the partners and the plaint is signed by an authorised person. On that basis, the suit was maintainable in principle and the matter was remanded for disposal according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>