https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290589 A deed executed by a living person was held inherently inadmissible under the law of evidence, and that defect was not cured merely because no objection was raised when it was tendered. The court's duty to exclude inadmissible material was emphasised, so the document could not be relied on in deciding the suit. Where the lower appellate court had substantially relied on that document, and it was unclear how far it influenced the finding, remand for reconsideration without the inadmissible evidence was proper. The remand was therefore upheld and the matter was to be decided afresh without the document. en-us Wed, 05 May 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:03:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290589 A deed executed by a living person was held inherently inadmissible under the law of evidence, and that defect was not cured merely because no objection was raised when it was tendered. The court's duty to exclude inadmissible material was emphasised, so the document could not be relied on in deciding the suit. Where the lower appellate court had substantially relied on that document, and it was unclear how far it influenced the finding, remand for reconsideration without the inadmissible evidence was proper. The remand was therefore upheld and the matter was to be decided afresh without the document. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 May 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290589