https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290587 Improper admission of evidence did not justify a retrial where the decree was supported by independent evidence and the judgment below rested on grounds unaffected by the inadmissible material. In second appeal, the Court would not re-examine sufficiency of evidence as a factual issue, and remand was unnecessary because the plaintiffs' title and possession were otherwise proved by witness evidence. The defendants failed to establish their nimhowla patta, as the lower court found no reliable or satisfactory proof. The appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1881 00:00:00 +0521 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 13:42:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290587 Improper admission of evidence did not justify a retrial where the decree was supported by independent evidence and the judgment below rested on grounds unaffected by the inadmissible material. In second appeal, the Court would not re-examine sufficiency of evidence as a factual issue, and remand was unnecessary because the plaintiffs' title and possession were otherwise proved by witness evidence. The defendants failed to establish their nimhowla patta, as the lower court found no reliable or satisfactory proof. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Apr 1881 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290587