<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399212</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with the addition on account of the alleged bogus gift being deleted due to the lack of incriminating material. The issue of interest charged under section 234A and 234B was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in all relevant cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399212</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with the addition on account of the alleged bogus gift being deleted due to the lack of incriminating material. The issue of interest charged under section 234A and 234B was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in all relevant cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>