<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 179 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Original Authority for a fresh review. The decision was based on the violation of natural justice principles and the legality of the value re-determination process. The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proving incorrect valuation lies with the department, not the appellant. They directed the Original Authority to complete the adjudication within 12 weeks to ensure a fair resolution in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:56:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 179 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Original Authority for a fresh review. The decision was based on the violation of natural justice principles and the legality of the value re-determination process. The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proving incorrect valuation lies with the department, not the appellant. They directed the Original Authority to complete the adjudication within 12 weeks to ensure a fair resolution in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>