<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 177 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company, involved in real estate, failed to file financial statements and annual returns, resulting in its strike off. The directors&#039; negligence was cited for the non-compliance. The company was directed to file pending returns within 30 days, pay a fine of Rs. 50,000, and ensure compliance. The Tribunal clarified that disqualified directors&#039; DINs couldn&#039;t be reactivated but allowed the company to file necessary documents for restoration. Compliance with statutory requirements was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 177 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company, involved in real estate, failed to file financial statements and annual returns, resulting in its strike off. The directors&#039; negligence was cited for the non-compliance. The company was directed to file pending returns within 30 days, pay a fine of Rs. 50,000, and ensure compliance. The Tribunal clarified that disqualified directors&#039; DINs couldn&#039;t be reactivated but allowed the company to file necessary documents for restoration. Compliance with statutory requirements was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>