https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399193 The Tribunal admitted the petition, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor based on substantial evidence of debt and default presented by the Financial Creditor. The objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding period of limitation, incorrect amount of default, and other issues were dismissed. An impleadment application by another party seeking to be included in the proceedings was rejected. The Tribunal appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), declared a moratorium, and directed compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:45:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399193 The Tribunal admitted the petition, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor based on substantial evidence of debt and default presented by the Financial Creditor. The objections raised by the Corporate Debtor regarding period of limitation, incorrect amount of default, and other issues were dismissed. An impleadment application by another party seeking to be included in the proceedings was rejected. The Tribunal appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), declared a moratorium, and directed compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399193