<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 162 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor due to non-payment of the operational debt. A moratorium was declared under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, suspending legal actions against the debtor and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the process. The IRP was tasked with managing the debtor&#039;s affairs, forming a Committee of Creditors, and providing regular progress reports to the Tribunal. The application for a stay on alienation of assets was dismissed following the admission of the CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:38:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 162 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor due to non-payment of the operational debt. A moratorium was declared under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, suspending legal actions against the debtor and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the process. The IRP was tasked with managing the debtor&#039;s affairs, forming a Committee of Creditors, and providing regular progress reports to the Tribunal. The application for a stay on alienation of assets was dismissed following the admission of the CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>