<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 158 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s. Rathi Steel &amp;amp; Power Ltd against a duty demand of Rs. 62,227 plus interest and penalty for the period 2011-12. The appellant&#039;s failure to reverse credit for cleared capital goods as scrap led to the duty demand. Despite opportunities, the appellant did not appear for hearings, resulting in ex-parte orders. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s new argument of a revenue neutral situation due to transferring goods to another factory, emphasizing timely participation in proceedings and adherence to procedural requirements. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 158 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s. Rathi Steel &amp;amp; Power Ltd against a duty demand of Rs. 62,227 plus interest and penalty for the period 2011-12. The appellant&#039;s failure to reverse credit for cleared capital goods as scrap led to the duty demand. Despite opportunities, the appellant did not appear for hearings, resulting in ex-parte orders. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s new argument of a revenue neutral situation due to transferring goods to another factory, emphasizing timely participation in proceedings and adherence to procedural requirements. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>