<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 69 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23417</link>
    <description>Transfer of 20,000 shares to the intended spouse under the 5 December 1969 agreement was held to be a &quot;gift&quot; under section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act because, on the factual findings, the transfer was made only in consideration of the recipient&#039;s agreement to marry the assessee. The Court treated a promise of marriage as valid contractual consideration, but not as consideration in money or money&#039;s worth for gift-tax purposes. Alleged additional considerations, including giving up employment and supporting parents, were rejected as unsupported by the agreement and the record. The transfer was therefore chargeable to gift tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 69 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23417</link>
      <description>Transfer of 20,000 shares to the intended spouse under the 5 December 1969 agreement was held to be a &quot;gift&quot; under section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act because, on the factual findings, the transfer was made only in consideration of the recipient&#039;s agreement to marry the assessee. The Court treated a promise of marriage as valid contractual consideration, but not as consideration in money or money&#039;s worth for gift-tax purposes. Alleged additional considerations, including giving up employment and supporting parents, were rejected as unsupported by the agreement and the record. The transfer was therefore chargeable to gift tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>