https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399177 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted in a dispute arising from alleged non-payment for building material supplied to a construction firm. The material before the HC indicated that the transaction was essentially between the complainant and the applicant's son, the sole proprietor of the firm, and the applicant was not shown on the face of the record to be directly concerned with the dispute. Without expressing any view on the merits, the Court treated the case as fit for protection against arrest, subject to furnishing the prescribed bond and surety and complying with statutory conditions and cooperation requirements. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399177 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted in a dispute arising from alleged non-payment for building material supplied to a construction firm. The material before the HC indicated that the transaction was essentially between the complainant and the applicant's son, the sole proprietor of the firm, and the applicant was not shown on the face of the record to be directly concerned with the dispute. Without expressing any view on the merits, the Court treated the case as fit for protection against arrest, subject to furnishing the prescribed bond and surety and complying with statutory conditions and cooperation requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399177