<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 150 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399176</link>
    <description>A secured creditor&#039;s statutory priority over government dues was reaffirmed, with the amended framework under Section 31B of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and Section 26-E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 giving overriding effect to secured debts. In the absence of a specific first charge for revenue claims, encumbrances entered for taxes and similar dues cannot prevail over the secured creditor&#039;s right to realise secured assets. On the stated facts, the encumbrances were treated as wrongly entered and could not obstruct registration of the auction purchaser&#039;s sale certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 150 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399176</link>
      <description>A secured creditor&#039;s statutory priority over government dues was reaffirmed, with the amended framework under Section 31B of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and Section 26-E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 giving overriding effect to secured debts. In the absence of a specific first charge for revenue claims, encumbrances entered for taxes and similar dues cannot prevail over the secured creditor&#039;s right to realise secured assets. On the stated facts, the encumbrances were treated as wrongly entered and could not obstruct registration of the auction purchaser&#039;s sale certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>