https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290560 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is warranted only if the trial court's view is unreasonable, perverse, or against the weight of evidence. The airport customs counter where the respondent was intercepted was treated as a restricted area, not a place open to the public, so Section 42 of the NDPS Act applied. The search officer was therefore required to record the information in writing and forward it to a superior officer. As no such compliance was shown, the trial court's acquittal was supported by the evidence and was not shown to be perverse. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 10:32:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290560 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is warranted only if the trial court's view is unreasonable, perverse, or against the weight of evidence. The airport customs counter where the respondent was intercepted was treated as a restricted area, not a place open to the public, so Section 42 of the NDPS Act applied. The search officer was therefore required to record the information in writing and forward it to a superior officer. As no such compliance was shown, the trial court's acquittal was supported by the evidence and was not shown to be perverse. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290560