https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399174 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the application to implead HDFC Bank as a respondent in the case under Order 1 Rule 10. The court also granted the writ petition to quash orders confirming the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account and property under the PGST/CGST Acts. The court directed the defreezing of all seven accounts, with the petitioner undertaking to maintain the pre-attachment balances. The bank's advocate agreed to this arrangement, and the Additional Advocate General did not contest, leading to the disposal of the petition and related applications. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399174 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the application to implead HDFC Bank as a respondent in the case under Order 1 Rule 10. The court also granted the writ petition to quash orders confirming the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account and property under the PGST/CGST Acts. The court directed the defreezing of all seven accounts, with the petitioner undertaking to maintain the pre-attachment balances. The bank's advocate agreed to this arrangement, and the Additional Advocate General did not contest, leading to the disposal of the petition and related applications. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399174