https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399153 A struck-off company sought restoration of its name in the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal considered the company's explanation for non-filing, its latest financial statements, and income tax return acknowledgment, and found the materials sufficient to justify revival. It held that restoration was just and equitable in the circumstances and directed consequential steps for reinstatement, including revival of the company's status and activation of DINs, subject to compliance conditions and costs. en-us Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2020 07:27:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399153 A struck-off company sought restoration of its name in the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal considered the company's explanation for non-filing, its latest financial statements, and income tax return acknowledgment, and found the materials sufficient to justify revival. It held that restoration was just and equitable in the circumstances and directed consequential steps for reinstatement, including revival of the company's status and activation of DINs, subject to compliance conditions and costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399153