<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 1027 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290534</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to consider the average fair market value (&#039;FMV&#039;) of the property as on 1.4.1981 at &amp;amp;8377; 5,16,200/- per ground, instead of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000/-. The tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s grounds of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2020 16:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 1027 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290534</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to consider the average fair market value (&#039;FMV&#039;) of the property as on 1.4.1981 at &amp;amp;8377; 5,16,200/- per ground, instead of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000/-. The tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s grounds of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>