<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1333 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290541</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16, remanding the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication in line with earlier tribunal findings. The judgment emphasized the need to analyze transaction details to ascertain the nature of payments and the applicability of TDS under section 194H.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2020 16:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1333 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290541</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16, remanding the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication in line with earlier tribunal findings. The judgment emphasized the need to analyze transaction details to ascertain the nature of payments and the applicability of TDS under section 194H.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>