<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 45 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23405</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for reference of a question of law regarding deduction under section 35(1) and 35(2) for plant and machinery used for production of TVs. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as the machinery was found to be used for research and development, based on factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 45 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23405</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for reference of a question of law regarding deduction under section 35(1) and 35(2) for plant and machinery used for production of TVs. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as the machinery was found to be used for research and development, based on factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>