<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1283 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290527</link>
    <description>A company name change certificate was set aside because the statutory process for alteration of name had not been properly followed and the affected parties were not given a fair opportunity to be heard. Under the Companies Act scheme governing registration and change of name, the authority was required to consider whether the proposed name was undesirable once an objection had been brought to its notice. The record did not show fair consideration of the objection or application of the statutory undesirability test before approval. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration after notice to the concerned parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1283 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290527</link>
      <description>A company name change certificate was set aside because the statutory process for alteration of name had not been properly followed and the affected parties were not given a fair opportunity to be heard. Under the Companies Act scheme governing registration and change of name, the authority was required to consider whether the proposed name was undesirable once an objection had been brought to its notice. The record did not show fair consideration of the objection or application of the statutory undesirability test before approval. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration after notice to the concerned parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>