https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399135 The court found the detention of goods during transportation under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, not unjustified due to missing documentation. The petitioner was allowed to clear the goods and the vehicle by furnishing a bank guarantee for the specified amount demanded in the detention notice. The respondents were directed to release the goods and the vehicle upon the petitioner providing the bank guarantee, with instructions to proceed with passing the final order under Section 129(3) of the GST Act after release. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399135 The court found the detention of goods during transportation under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, not unjustified due to missing documentation. The petitioner was allowed to clear the goods and the vehicle by furnishing a bank guarantee for the specified amount demanded in the detention notice. The respondents were directed to release the goods and the vehicle upon the petitioner providing the bank guarantee, with instructions to proceed with passing the final order under Section 129(3) of the GST Act after release. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399135