https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399134 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging assessment orders passed under Section 62 of the CGST Act, advising the petitioner, a private limited company providing ayurvedic and spa services, to seek remedy through the statutory appellate authority. The petitioner's argument that subsequent filing of returns should lead to withdrawal of assessment orders was rejected as returns were filed beyond the stipulated 30-day period after the orders were published on the portal. Recovery actions related to the assessment orders were stayed for a month to allow the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. en-us Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399134 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging assessment orders passed under Section 62 of the CGST Act, advising the petitioner, a private limited company providing ayurvedic and spa services, to seek remedy through the statutory appellate authority. The petitioner's argument that subsequent filing of returns should lead to withdrawal of assessment orders was rejected as returns were filed beyond the stipulated 30-day period after the orders were published on the portal. Recovery actions related to the assessment orders were stayed for a month to allow the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399134