<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399125</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed both Tax Case Appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. The foreign travel expenditure and legal charges for acquisition were considered allowable revenue expenditures. The disallowance of expenditure under repairs and maintenance was overturned, confirming it as revenue expenditure. The Court emphasized commercial expediency and safeguarding the interests of the holding company in its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399125</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed both Tax Case Appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. The foreign travel expenditure and legal charges for acquisition were considered allowable revenue expenditures. The disallowance of expenditure under repairs and maintenance was overturned, confirming it as revenue expenditure. The Court emphasized commercial expediency and safeguarding the interests of the holding company in its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>