<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399113</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,59,45,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for assessments under section 153A. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the requirement for incriminating evidence as established by Delhi HC precedents, ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399113</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,59,45,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for assessments under section 153A. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the requirement for incriminating evidence as established by Delhi HC precedents, ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>