<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 65 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399091</link>
    <description>Under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an application is admissible when default is established, the application is complete, and there is no pending disciplinary proceeding against the proposed interim resolution professional. The financial creditor supported the claim with the sanction letter, channel finance agreement, facility documents, hypothecation, guarantee, account statements and recall notices. The corporate debtor&#039;s objection that funds were not directly disbursed to it was rejected because the arrangement contemplated payment to named sellers under the channel finance structure. As the record showed a suitable IRP with consent and the default crossed the statutory threshold, the insolvency application was admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 65 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399091</link>
      <description>Under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an application is admissible when default is established, the application is complete, and there is no pending disciplinary proceeding against the proposed interim resolution professional. The financial creditor supported the claim with the sanction letter, channel finance agreement, facility documents, hypothecation, guarantee, account statements and recall notices. The corporate debtor&#039;s objection that funds were not directly disbursed to it was rejected because the arrangement contemplated payment to named sellers under the channel finance structure. As the record showed a suitable IRP with consent and the default crossed the statutory threshold, the insolvency application was admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>